Especially big, flat-screen televisions hanging on walls in the wilds west of Boston.
Apparently the hottest new trend in book-related writing is to proclaim, with much weeping and gnashing of teeth, the ongoing decline in American interest in reading of all kinds. The Boston Globe ran an article last weekend which, predictably, cites the aforementioned How to Talk About Books You Haven't Read as evidence of this trend. (I think it's evidence of a different kind of trend.) What I find interesting, though, is that the author's impetus for coming to this realization was the fact that she got stuck in Worcester, Massachusetts, without a book, and was feeling mocked by the gigantic flat-screen in her hotel room. (Worcester! Horrors! It's so backward it's practically the deep South! It's too bad there aren't nine colleges within the city itself - a city so devoid of intellectual life would never have any bookstores. In fact, my education - received as it was in the even vaster, emptier wasteland surrounding that city - was conducted entirely through the use of cave paintings, until I miraculously woke up one day at college and fully literate, in the author's fair city of Cambridge.) Our heroine found herself stranded in Worcester in the middle of a snowstorm, which might make bookstore-visiting difficult, but she's acting like she's been set adrift in the middle of the South Pacific on a shipping pallet, when her destination was a college campus in a major New England city. So, her hopelessness, not to mention her melodramatic handwringing at the awfulness of the giant TV - which: it's one night of your life, lady, get a grip - is not by any stretch of the imagination justified under the circumstances.
Furthermore, if you set out on such a drive, in the middle of a snowstorm which has been vociferously predicted for days and days, and you are a self-professed advocate of reading, what on earth are you doing leaving the house without a book? You cannot possibly tell me that you expected not to get stuck - something like a foot of snow was predicted (and fell) that night, and any idiot ought to know that a bad storm in Boston is almost without fail a worse one in Worcester. I don't go anywhere without a book in my purse, just like I don't go anywhere without a blanket and a roadside emergency kit in the car. "Bookless in Worcester." Shut it, lady. She takes her smugly superior dismay at being bookless in the City of Seven Hills (yes, and shut up, and bonus points if you can name any seven hills in Worcester) into what might be called a review of a collection of interviews from The Paris Review, in which various writers talk about writing and literature and reading, if it did anything more than cite with approbation authors who think reading is on its way out (Faulkner) and patronizingly deride authors who express some optimism regarding the intellectual curiosity of the human race (Issac Bashevis Singer). This is after a couple of nasty asides about books that aren't intended to be read, like a collection of pulp crime novels. (What did you expect them to be like, lady? They're pulp fiction. I'm not sure it's possible to read them, like, unironically, which she seems to have been trying to do.)
The NEA's numbers are more or less undisputed, at this point, I guess. Reading, and interest in reading, is on the decline. Harry Potter, and The DaVinci Code, and His Dark Materials and their attendant movie adaptations notwithstanding, Americans are more interested in the TV and the internet than they are in literature, apparently. But I see plenty of people on the bus and the train reading every morning; maybe they're just reading the Metro, or Boston NOW, but they're reading. Not everybody wants to read Proust, you know? Some people want to read for fun, and there's nothing wrong with that. Reading is hard to multi-task. It requires a hand and both eyes, really - it's not something you can do while driving, or cooking, or talking on the phone, or checking your email, or giving your kid a bath. It takes time and quiet in a way that's becoming increasingly rare in modern life. But I don't feel a sense of despair about it. People who are going to read How to Talk About Books You Haven't Read are the kind of people who weren't going to read the books anyway, you know?



10 comments:
What's more, your story is way better than hers was.
At first I thought you were picking at her for dissing Worcester. I thought you were missing her point that it wasn't the location, it was her booklessness (am I making up words? LOL) I was sympathizing with Powers.
But then you wrote "....if you set out on such a drive, in the middle of a snowstorm which has been vociferously predicted for days and days, and you are a self-professed advocate of reading, what on earth are you doing leaving the house without a book?"
You are exactly right! I was feeling bad for Powers because I know how I hate to be stranded and bored without a book. Then again, I make it a point to always have books. Besides books in the house, I keep a "car book" something I can pick up and put down easily. I print short articles on line to keep in my gym bag. That way if the TV on the treadmill offers nothing, I have these articles.
So you definitely won me over in this post. Powers was not prepared and has no one to blame but herself.
@ gareth - Thanks!
@ bostonmaggie - To be fair, I was bagging on her attitude towards Worcester a little, but... yeah. Her predicament was a) foreseeable b) entirely her fault and c) not really all that desperate or impossible to remedy. And such a lame jumping off point for a lame article. "I found myself without a book" is really proving her own point, and not in the way she intended, I think. Thanks for stopping by!
Thanks to Universal Hub for the link, and welcome to anyone coming here from there!
You go girl!! Stand up for Worcester!! Not that there isn't Tatnic book sellers that i know would've been open on a very snowy day. what a pretention bio-tch. I love it when someone russle your fury!!
I'd argue that reading is on a dramatic up tick.
That's what were doing on the tubes mostly after all, is it not?
@ woman in a dark room - Tatnuck Booksellers closed! Well, they kept the Westboro store, but they closed the Worcester one that was in the old Sleeper & Hartley factory, about two years ago now. I spent so much time in their first store as a little kid.
@ anon - Yeah, I think the way we read is changing, and *what* we read is changing. I don't know how effective studies like the NEA's are at picking up on that - certainly this article wasn't interested in thoroughly exploring those trends, though I don't mean to knock it for that (or that alone, anyway).
Hello-
Every week Worcester Magazine scours the web for the best of locally meaningful blogs, and reprints excerpts from these entries in our Blog Log column. It’s sort of a blog in reverse, if you will.
We wanted to let you know that one of your entries has been chosen to run in the coming week’s issue and will appear with full credit given to the author and blog we got it from.
Be sure to check out this week’s issue, and feel free to contact us at editorial@worcestermag.com
Thanks!
The staff
Worcester does have bookstores, although it is very very very sad that Tatnuck is no more. I loved that place. I remember getting my copy of "Just Farr Fun" signed there by Jamie Farr from M*A*S*H. Oh, good days.
And yes, what was she doing going out without a book? Even if she couldn't get to some of the great libraries around her (i.e. Holy Cross, Clark... Every great American city has at least one college, Worcester has TEN), she should have brought something with her.
Or at least watched some PBS.
@ scott - Wow, thanks!
@ kate - Seriously! I miss that bookstore SO MUCH. I used to spend all my babysitting money there.
Post a Comment